Tom Padgett's Divorce and Child Support Cases
Padgett Case Home Timeline Scanned Documents Closer Look

Scanned Documents

Temporary Index to scanned documents relating to Tom Padgett's divorce, child custody, and flagrant non-support cases.

  • Pendente Lite hearing, Sept. 1992, with no reference to Scientology

  • 2001 Deposition Cross-Examination of Tom Padgett

  • Tom Padgett's adultery the real reason Laura filed for divorce from Padgett

  • Claims of court bias in Hopkins County

  • Questionnaires Padgett administered to his minor children

  • Padgett stiffs his attorney, who sues him for nonpayment

  • Padgett's two letters to the minister of his ex-wife and children in late December 1995 and early January 1996.

  • Laura's 1992 Petition for Divorce (now with text in HTML form as well as the image files).

  • The October 1 Report and Recommendation of the Special Master Commissioner

  • Oct 13 contempt motion by Laura due to Tom Padgett no producing financial records and not paying insurance on the Eagle vehicle.

  • Lawsuit filed by Tom Padgett's mother, Shirely, against Laura in Florida in Dec 1992.

  • Tom Padgett files for divorce 3 weeks after his wife does, in a county neither reside in.

  • Motion from May 18, 1992 to hold Tom Padgett in contempt for failure to pay medical bills, among other things

  • Judge's Order June 29, 1992 cuts him some slack with healthcare bills -- a topic which will be revisited.

  • Padgett's letter to a dental office which has requested that he, as ordered, pay for services delivered to his kids.

  • Judge's order from February 3, 1993, in which Padgett has a bailiff for an escort and must be threatened with jail to sign a financial document.

  • Tom Padgett Answers Interrogatories, December 05, 19/92, with several unusual answers.

  • Padgett now claims that a decision from June, 1995 was "final." So why did he appeal it?

  • Reply to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss

More to come

Note: the dates reported on documents are generally the date they are filed with the Court, not the date they were produced, so some dates may not precisely match up with those written in the documents.


Padgett Case HomeTimelineScanned DocumentsCloser Look