Tom Padgett's Divorce and Child Support Cases
Padgett Case Home Timeline Scanned Documents Closer Look

Report and Recommendation of Special Master, 10/01/92

The first Special Master Commisioner's Report and Reccomendation in the Padgett case, released October 1, 1992. Using standard Kentucky State rules, Tom Padgett is responsible for the children's health insurance (he soon begins to fail to pay the bills for their medical and dental work), and is responsible for $1123.43 in child support. Within months, he is in arrears in child support.

This is before he ceases working or reporting to the court the money he has access to, and before his first false report of Scientology interference in his case.

The images for this document are here.

 

 

                  COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
                   HOPKINS CIRCUIT COURT
                 MADISONVILLE, KENTUCKY 42431 
                  CIVIL ACTION NO. 92-CI-00444
				  
				  

   LAURA VANNOY PADGETT
   

    AND                              REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
  

   THOMAS CARTER PADGETT
   

          This matter is before the Court on the Motion of the
petitioner, Laura Vannoy Padgett, to enter pendente lite orders.
The Petitioner, hereinafter Laura, moved the Court to grant her
custody and control of the parties infant children namely, Julie
Elizabeth Padgett and Beau Granville Padgett, pendente lite. In
addition, she requests that the Respondent pay child support and
maintenance to the Petitioner. She further requests the awarding
of the personal marital property she now has in her possession and
that the proceeds of the sale of the parties former residence
located in Lexington, Kentucky be equally divided pendente lite.

          A hearing on Laura's motion was held on Friday, September
18, 1992. Both parties were present and represented by counsel.
Laura is employed as a speech pathologist for the Hopkins County
Board of Education and she has gross monthly earnings of $2,140.00.
The Respondent, hereinafter Thomas, works as a manager for the
Radisson Plaza Hotel in Southfield, Michigan. Thomas earns gross
monthly wages of $7,083.00. During the hearing, Laura requested
sole temporary custody and Thomas requested joint custody. During
the hearing, it became apparent to the Special Master Commissioner
that at the present time Laura and Thomas were unable to make
reasoned joint decisions concerning their two children because of


-2-


their present animosity towards each other. In addition, because
of the distance between Madisonville, Kentucky and Southfield, 
Michigan it is unclear to the Commissioner how the parties could 
have a meaningful joint custody relationship with their children. 
Therefore, for the foregoing reasons, the Commissioner recommends 
that Laura have sole custody of the parties two children during the 
pendency of this action. Thomas shall have visitation with his two 
children one weekend per month. Thomas may choose his weekend but 
must give Laura ten days prior notice of his intent to exercise 
visitation. This is a deviation from the Hopkins Circuit Court 
Guidelines to Child Visitation, however, Thomas requested this 
deviation due to the distance between Southfield, Michigan and 
Madisonville, Kentucky. Thomas shall be responsible for any 
transportation costs, however, should Thomas choose to fly his 
children to Southfield, Michigan for his visitation, Laura shall 
be responsible for their transportation to and from either the 
airport in Evansville, Indiana or the airport in Nashville, 
Tennessee.

     Both parties testified at the hearing that Laura has been 
monitoring the conversations between her two children and their 
father, Thomas. The Master Commissioner recommends that Thomas 
shall be permitted to have private conversations with his children 
by telephone at least once per week at his own expense.

     In accordance with KRS 403.212, Thomas shall be required 
to pay child support of $1,123.43 per month. Thomas shall also be 
required to maintain hospitalization and health insurance for the


-3-

children with any medical expenses in excess of the amount of
insurance to be paid 77% by Thomas and 23% by Laura.

     The Commissioner further recommends that Laura should 
have the marital property presently in her possession pendente lite 
which includes the parties Eagle automobile. Thomas shall have the 
marital property presently in his possession pendente lite.
Laura requested that Thomas be required to maintain the 
marital debt pendente lite. Both parties testified that the only 
significant debt was for the parties Eagle automobile. Because of 
the great disparity in income, it is recommended that Thomas be 
required to pay the minimum monthly payment on the Eagle automobile 
and maintain full coverage auto insurance on the Eagle automobile. 
Laura shall make the minimum required monthly payments on her two 
credit cards.

     Laura requested that the proceeds from the sale of the 
parties former residence in Lexington, Kentucky be divided equally 
at this time. Both parties acknowledged that their is $28,068.55
being held in escrow from the sale of the parties marital 
residence. Thomas testified that the equity from the sale of the 
parties residence in Lexington, Kentucky is encumbered by a loan 
obligation to his mother. Laura contends that there is no such 
loan obligation. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the Master
Commissioner that the parties sign all appropriate documents to 
transfer the entire $28,068.55 to a federally insured financial 
institution in Madisonville, Kentucky where the $28,068.55 shall 
be placed in a 6 month certificate of deposit. Division between


-4-

the parties of the proceeds from the sale of the house is deferred 
until the final disposition in this matter.
 
      It is also the recommendation of the Commissioner that 
both parties not dispose of any marital property, which includes 
personal property, real property and any investments, without prior 
approval of the Court during pendency of this action.

      Finally, the attorney representing the Respondent moved 
the Special Master Commissioner to recuse himself because of past 
and present cases in which we have been involved. Since, the 
Special Master Commissioner does not know nor has he ever met 
either of the Padgett's before the hearing held on September 18, 
1992 and considering that the Special Master Commissioner has 
practiced on opposite sides in divorce litigation with both 
attorneys in this matter, the Special Master Commissioner declines 
to recuse himself at this time.

    So Ordered this  	29 day of September, 1992


                      [signature]
                       Special Master commissioner 
                       Hopkins Circuit Court


       CERTIFICATE
        This instrument filed of record in the office of the Clerk of the
        Hopkins Circuit Court on this the 1 day of October	
        1992 . A copy of said instrument was mailed on this the
        1 day of October, 1992  to the attorneys 
        of record and to the parties, if not represented by counsel.
        PAUL A. SUMMERS, CLERK
         [signature]


-4-


                 
[signature]
Special Master commissioner 
Hopkins Circuit Court
         CERTIFICATE
         This instrument filed of record in the office of the Clerk of the
         Hopkins Circuit Court on this the 1 day of October	
         1992.  A copy of said instrument was mailed on this the
         1 day of October, 1992, to the attorneys 
         of record and to the parties, if not represented by counsel.
         PAUL A. SUMMERS, CLERK
         by: [signature]
         D.C.
		 

-4-
		 
 

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY WORKSHEET FOR MONTHLY CHILD SUPPORT OBLIGATION

 
 

A.CUSTODIAL

PARENT

B. NON-CUSTODIAL

PARENT

C. BOTH PARENTS
Monthly Gross Income $2140 $7083  

Reduction for Payment of Child's Health
Insurance Premiums

  $96  
Reduction for Ordered Child Support      
Adjusted Monthly Income $ 2140 $ 6987  
Combined Parental Income     $9127
Percentage of Combined Parental Income 23% 77%  
[?] Child Support Obligation     $ 1459

tion of Work-Related Child Care Cost

(Discretionary by the courts)

     
[?] Monthly Child Support Obligation (add lines 7 + 8)     $1459
Parental Obligations (Multiply line 9 by the Percentage amounts on Line 6) $ 335.57 $ 1123.43  
Monthly Child Support Obligation   $ 1123.43  


INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE:

Enter each parent's gross monthly income.
Enter the amount actually paid by either or both parents for child(ren)'s 
health insurance.
Enter child support paid under a pre-existing order.
Subtract any amounts on lines 2 and 3 from th eline amounts on line 1: if less 
than 0, enter 0.
Add teh amounts on line 4 in Column A and B to obtain Combined Parental Income.
Divide each of the amounts on line 4 by the total on line 5.  Enter the percentage 
amounts on line 6.
Refer to the Guideline to determine the base support obligation.
Enter monthly payment for child care (Discretionary for the courts).
Add lines 7 and 8.  This is the Monthly Child Support Obligation.
Multiply the total monthly obligation by the percentage amounts from line 6.
The dollar value of the non-custodial parent's percentage share of the total 
monthly obligation on line 10B becomes the suppoort obligation.

 


Padgett Case Home Timeline Scanned Documents Closer Look