JAN 5, 1996
TO: JULIE AND BEAU'S PASTORS..........
TOM WEBSTER WHILE IN KENTUCKY
JIM KLUKOW WHILE IN FLORIDA
DEAR TOM AND JIM:
I HAVE SOME SERIOUS AND TROUBLING QUESTIONS YOU CAN HELP ME WITH.RE:
MY CHILDREN AND THEIR BEST INTERESTS AND TRUTHS IN LIFE. LAST DEC 18
THE JUDGE IN MADISONVILLE RULED THAT MY VISITATION OVER X-MAS WAS TO
BE CUT SHORT FROM FIVE DAYS DOWN TO A DAY AND A HALF BECAUSE OF THEIR
MOM'S WISHES.` THE CHILDRENS MOM AND I BOTH KNOW THIS WAS TO ACCOMPLISH
SCIENTOLOGY "DISCONNECTION" ACTUALLY I THINK EVERYBODY KNOWS THIS. THE
COURT AVOIDS THE SUBJECT YET SANCTIONS IT. WHAT PUZZLES ME THE MOST
IS THE COURT WENT ON TO ORDER "I SHALL NOT DISCUSS SCIENTOLOGY, CUSTODY,
OR VISITATION PROBLEMS WITH THE CHILDREN." AND THE"CHILDREN SHALL NOT
SIGN ANY DOCUMENTS." AND"EITHER PARTY SHALL NOT HARASS" EACHOTHER. " " THE
LATTER I THINK WAS GOOD, BUT IT DID NOT DEFINE WHAT HARASSMENT WAS AND
MEANT IN THIS CASE. THIS WAS IMPORTANT TO ME AS I HAVE NO DESIRE TO
HARASS NOR IS IT A CHRISTIAN RULE AS IT IS A SCIENTOLOGY POLICY.
MY QUESTIONS ARE NOT JUST FOR ME BUT FOR JULIE AND BEAU, MY FAMILY, AND
FRIENDS. THEY ARE NOT QUESTIONS OF LEGALITY. THEY ARE QUESTIONS MORE
ETHICAL, MORAL, AND THEOLOGICAL IN NATURE. JIM YOU HAVE BEEN HELPFULL
IN THE PAST,VERY HELPFULL. IN CALLING THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE IN
VIRGINIA, THEY CONFIRM THIS IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL NOT ONLY FOR ME BUT FOR.
.JULIE AND BEAU AND JUST THE KIND OF ISSUE THAT CAUSED JOHN WHITEHEAD TO
FORM THIS ASSOCIATION AND ALLIANCE. THEY AGREED THAT MY CHILDRENS MOTHER
HAS.. THE TOTAL RIGHT PRACTICE HER.BELIEF",..BUT NOT AT THE HARM AND EXPENSE=
OF ANOTHER. THEY ALSO NOTED A COURT OR JUDGE SHOULD BE AGGRESSIVELY
CHALLENGED IF FREE AND OPEN DISCUSSIQN OF RELIGION IS SUPPRESSED BETWEEN
A PARENT AND CHILD. IT IS MY SINCERE BELIEF THAT THIS JUDGE IS SO
PERSONALLY INVOLVED: IN THIS MATTER THAT HIS JUDICIAL INSIGHT AND. RE-
SPONSIBILITY HAS BEEN SEVERELY COMPROMIZED IF NOT BLINDED. THE ONLY THING
WE HAVE IN COMMON IS WE BELIEVE EACHOTHER IS REPREHENSIBLE FOR OUR
POSITIONS AND ACTIONS IN THIS CRITICAL MATTER. THIS JUDGE ALMOST TWO
YEARS AGO WROTE AN ORDER THAT SCIENTOLOGY IS INADMISSIBLE IN THIS
LEGAL PROCEEDING. JUSTIFYING HIS DECISION HE QUOTED 18th, CENTURY
PHILOSOPHER JOHN LOCKE ON HIS THOUGHTS OR THE NON-INTERVENTION -OF GOVERN- .-
MENT (courts) RELATIVE TO RELIGION. ON THE SURFACE THIS DOES PROVIDE FOR
SOME KIND OF INTELLECTUAL LOGIC OR REASONING. FURTHER READING OF THE
BRILLIANT MR LOCKE, WOULD DISCOVER THAT HE WAS A CHRISTIAN AND QUOTED
"THERE IS NO MAGISTRATE HIGHER THAN GOD." THOUGH I AM VERY SURE IT WAS
POLITICALLY INCORRECT TO.CHALLENGE THE JUDGE (back when I was not represented
legally and had a bench warrant for my arrest active soley based on a,
report from a scientology group Lauras lawyer hired) BUT I FELT IT WAS MY
RESPONSIBILITY AS A FATHER AND A CHRISTIAN. NEITHER OF THESE RESPONS-
IBILITIES SHOULD BE COMPROMIZED BY POLITICS. I SHOULD NOT BE EMBARRASSED
OF EITHER QUALITY AND TITLE TOO. A GOOD FRIEND OF MINE HAD GIVEN ME
A ONE-PAGE ARTICLE ON "THE ART OF JUDGING." I PASSED IT ON TO JUDGE
BOTELER IN MADISONVILLE LAST SEPTEMBER WITH KEY RELEVANT POINTS ASTERISKED
AND UNDERLINED. AGAIN PROBABLY POLITICAL SUICIDE FOR ME, BUT I THOUGHT
THIS MAN HAD GONE SO PAR OUT OF HIS WAY TO DISREGARD THESE KEY QUALITIES
IN JUDGING. I DID NOT THINK MY LOVE OF MY CHILDREN AND GOD REQUIRED
POLITICS OR HOLDING BACK. ON THE CONTRARY IT REQUIRED. DEMONSTRATION AND
NOT JUST LIP SERVICE OR "SUPPRESSION" -- A SCIENTOLOGY POLICY.
-2-
THE ARTICLE ON JUDGING IS ATTACHED. PLEASE NOTE THE LAST KEY POINT I
HIGHLIGHTED. HE IS ON VIDEO NOW CALLING ME AN "ASS" FROM THE 12/18/95
BASED ON THE PLEADINGS OF LAURAS ATTORNEY WHO IS DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO
SCIENTOLOGY IN THE HEADQUARTERS IN CLEARWATER, FL. AS WELL AS A BOUGHT AND
PAID FOR LETTER FROM A PSYCHOLOGIST WHO IS CLUELESS ABOUT CLINICAL TESTING
AND AFRAID TO COMMENT ON THE POLICIES OF SCIENTOLOGY AND HOW IT IS EFFECTING
MY CHILDREN. AGAIN I FIND IT INTERESTING THAT A JUDGE SHOULD REFER TO A
PERSON WHO STANDS BEFORE HIM DEMANDING JUSTICE AND WISDOM .... (NOT ATTITUDES)
AS AN "ASS" WHEN I ALSO HAVE THE HIGHEST RANKING PERSON AT THE NASHVILLE
SCIENTOLOGY CENTER ON CASSETTE TAPE NOTING'• ME AS AN` "ASSHOLE"...CUTE!!
NEITHER OF THESE PARTIES KNOW ME PERSONALLY, PROFESSIONALLY, OR PARENTALLY.
ONLY THROUGH MY CHILDRENS MOTHER AND HER "HIRED GUN" LEGAL COUNSEL. THIS
IS A BAD REALITY.
THE QUESTIONS ARE:
* DO YOU THINK IT IS ODD THAT I, THE CHRISTIAN PARENT OF TWO CHRISTIAN
CHILDREN NOT BE ABLE TO DISCUSS RELIGION WITH THEM. SCIENTOLOGY IN THIS
CASE.
* DO YOU THINK IT IS ODD THAT I CAN NOT DISCUSS CUSTODY AND VISITATION
ISSUES WITH MY CHILDREN WHEN IT IS SCIENTOLOGY'S POLICY OF " DISCON-
NECTION," "SUPPRESS," "TRICK," "LIE TO," AND "DESTROY" KEEPING US
A PART.
* DO YOU THINK IT IS ODD THAT THE CHILDRENS MOTHER IS THE ONE TO HAVE
COMPLETE FREEDOM TO DISCUSS RELIGIOUS, CUSTODY, AND VISITATION ISSUES
AS THE SCIENTOLOGIST PARENT.
* DO YOU THINK IT IS ODD THAT A COURT WOULD ORDER THAT "BOTH PARTIES
SHALL NOT HARASS EACHOTHER." BUT NOT BE SPECIFIC ON WHAT CONSTITUTES
HARASSMENT WHEN IT IS CLEAR THAT I AM THE PARTY WHO HAS BEEN HARASSED
TO NEAR NON-EXISTENCE. THIS JUDGES OWN COURT ROOM IS BEING USED FOR a
AN HARASSMENT PLAYING FIELD TO-:"ATTACK, HARM, SUPPRESS" "TRICK, SUE,
LIE TO, AND DESTROY" "DISCONNECTION OF CHILDREN" "USE THE LAW TO
HARASS AND RUIN" "MAKE IT ROUGH" "USE OUR OWN INVESTIGATORS" ON AND
ON. AND ALL OF THIS BEING PROTECTED UNDER THE CHILDRENS MOTHERS
FIRST AMENDENTMENT RIGHTS TO PRACTICE THESE UPON JULIE,BEAU, AND MYSELF.
IF I DEMAND MY SAME AN EQUAL RIGHTS AS A CHRISTIAN TO "DELIVER US FROM
EVIL" I AM FACED WITH A CONTEMPT OF COURT CHARGE AND POSSIBLE JAIL
TERM OR CEASE ALL CONTACT WITH ME AND MY CHILDREN AS HAVING BEHAVIOR
OR CHARACTER PROBLEMS. OR BEING "SUPRVISED" AS NOT TO TALK TRUTHS
WITH MY OWN CHILDREN.
THERE ARE OFTEN TIMES MORTAL BEINGS ARE TESTED MORE THAN OTHERS. THEY
REACH OUT FOR SUPPORT AND HELP. THIS IS PURPOSE OF THIS LETTER. I AM
REACHING OUT AND PRAYING TO GOD FOR HELP AND YOURS JUST AS LAURA HAS
REACHED OUT TO L.RON HUBBARD AND HIS FACILITATORS. WE HAVE BOTH SOUGHT
SUPPORT FROM OUR FAMILIES DURING THIS DIFFICULT TIME. THE DIFFERENCE IS
LAURAS FAMILY KNOWS THE JUDGE. MINE DON'T. THE DIFFERENCES START TO GROW
EVEN GREATER. I WANT TO BE OUT IN THE OPEN ON ALL SUBJECTS AND COMMUNICATE.
LAURA WANTS EVERYTHING HELD SECRET AND TO SEVER COMMUNICATION OR ONLY DO
IT BEFORE THE JUDGE IN MADISONVILLE, KY. LAURA HIRED AN ATTORNEY TO
ATTACK, DESTROY, DISCONNECT, AND BE OBNOXIOUS AND DECEIVING. I HIRED
ATTORNEYS TO BE OPEN, HONEST, FAIR, COMMUNICATIVE, AND AVOID LITIGATION.
THE TERM HONORABLE REFERED TO BY ATTORNIES AND JUDGES AS SOME FRATERNAL
TRADITION BECOMES NEBULOUS IF NOT MEANINGLESS IF IN THE EYES OF GOD IF THEY
ALLOW THEMSELVES TO THINK THEIR ACTIONS ARE NOT ACCOUNTABLE FOR. WHEN THE
HEARTS, MINDS, AND SOULS OF YOUR OWN CHILDREN ARE HURTING IT IS INSTINCT
-3-
OF A LOVING LOVING AND CARING PARENT TO WANT THE HURTING AND CONFUSION TO STOP.
THE PRIMARY BELIEFS AND MOTIVES OF JULIE AND BEAUS PARENTS ARE DRASTICALLY
AND DRAMATICALLY DIFFERENT ON HOW TO STOP THIS. LAURAS IS TO STOP THE
FATHER. MINE IS TO STOP THE SCIENTOLOGY INFLUENCES AND INFLICTIONS UPON
ALL OF US. LAURAS IS TO CONTROL EVERYTHING INCLUDING THEIR THOUGHTS.
MINE IS TO GIVE UNCONTROLLED FREEDOM AND CRITICAL THINKING. PRESENT BOTH
SIDES AND GIVE CHOICES. THESE CHILDREN DO NOT NEED TO BE PROTECTED FROM
THEIR FATHER, THEY NEED PROTECTION FROM INFLUENCES THAT IS CAUSING AND
CREATING ANIMOSITY IN THE THE LIVES OF THEIR FAMILIES.
IN THE FINAL DIVORCE AND CUSTODY RULING BOTH THE JUDGE
AND COMMISSIONER IN THIS MATTER RECOMMENDED LAURA LIMIT THE CHILDRENS
EXPOSURE TO SCIENTOLOGY. OBVIOUSLY I DID NOT DISAGREE WITH THIS. BUT
CONSISTENTLY THIS COURT NEVER OR REFUSES TO ELABORATE ON ITS RULINGS
WITH ANY DETAIL, REASONS, FACTUAL BACK-UP, OR CAUSE. I PERSONALLY BEIEVE
IT IS TO JUST STICK ENOUGH IN TO SUGGEST THEY DON'T CONDONE IT OR POLICIES
TO FREE THEM OR THEIR CONSCIENCE OF. ANY LIABILITY FOR EXAMPLE THEY
REFER TO MY "SIGNIFICANT INCOME POTENTIAL" FROM MY PAST SUCCESFULL AND
FINANCIALLY REWARDING HOTEL CAREER BUT PRETEND I AM NOT UNEMPLOYED FROM
CULTIC ATTACKS ON MY PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL CHARACTER. ANOTHER SUGGESTED
JUSTIFIER TO CLEAR THEIR CONSCIENCES SO MATHMATICALLY LOPSIDED FINANCIAL
JUDGEMENTS CAN BE MADE AGAINST ME. BUT NOT REALITY OR EXPLORED DETAIL AS
THE TRUTH HURTS THEM.
* DO YOU THINK I OR MY ATTORNEYS SHOULD ASK THE JUDGE AND COMMISSIONER
TO CLARIFY THIS RULING/RECOMMENDATION OF MY CHILDRENS MOTHER LIMITING THEIR
EXPOSURE TO SCIENTOLOGY? DOES IT SIMPLY MEAN LAURA SHOULD NOT. TAKE
THEM TO NASHVILLE FOR "DIANETIC PROCESSING" OR DOES IT MEAN
LAURA SHALL NOT EXPOSE THEM DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY TO THE POLICIES,
PRACTICES, AND DOCTRINES OF SCIENTOLOGY SUCH AS:
1.THE CHILDREN SHALL NOT BE >SUPPRESSED.
2.THE CHILDREN SHALL NOT BE AUDITED OR PROCESSED.
3.THE CHILDREN SHALL NOT BE DICONNECTED FROM THEIR CHRISTIAN FATHER.
4.THE CHILDREN SHALL NOT BE TRICKED OR LIED TO.
5. THE CHILDREN SHALL NOT HAVE THEIR THOUGHTS CONTROLLED OR HIDDEN.
6.THAT THEIR FATHER/PROVIDER WHO HAS BEEN DEADFILED AND DECLARED AN
"SP" AND "PTS" ENEMY SHOULD NOT BE ATTACKED, HARMED, SUPPRESSED, LIED TO
DESTROYED.
7.THE PROVIDER OF THE CHILDRENS FINANCIAL CHILD SUPPORT (THEIR FATHER)
SHALL NOT HAVE HIS CAREER REPUTATION ATTACKED NOR HIS PROFESSIONAL
PRIVACY INFILTRATED. OR INVESTIGATED BY SCIENTOLOGY AGENTS.
8.THE CHILDRENS FATHER SHALL NOT BE HARASSED, RUINED, AND HIS DECEASE
NOT BE CAUSED BY USING THE LAW.
9. NOONE SHALL MAKE IT ROUGH ON THE CHILDREN OR THEIR PARENTS.
10.THAT TRAINING ROUTINES TR-0, TR-1, TR-BULLBAIT, AND TR-L (LYING) SHALL
NOT BE APPLIEDTO THE CHILDREN, OR BETWEEN THE PARENTS TO PREVENT
LOGICAL, RATIONAL, TWO-WAY, CONSTRUCTIVE, AND AFFORDABLE NON-LITIGATIVE
COMMUNICATION BETWEEN ALL FOUR (4) PARTIES -- PARENTS AND CHILDREN.
THE SCIENTOLOGY DOCTRINE IS UNDERLINED FOR EMPHASIS. TOM PERHAPS AS
JULIE AND BEAUS MINISTER IN MADISONVILLE YOU CAN APPROACH THE JUDGE ON
THIS CRITICAL AND NECESSARY ISSUE FOR CLARIFICATION AGAIN AS A SPIRITUAL
AND MENTAL HEALTH MATTER OVER A LEGAL OR POLITICAL CONCERN.
THANKS FOR ANY HELP OR UNDRERSTANDING IN THIS EVOLVED TRAGEDY. I THINK
A LOT OF PEOPLE (FRIENDS & FAMILY ON BOTH SIDES)NEED HELP ON THIS INCLUDING
THE LEGAL DECISION MAKERS. PRAYERS WON'T HURT EITHER.
.....I STRONGLY BELIEVE ONES EMOTIONAL AND MENTAL WELL BEING DIRECTLY
-4-
CORRELATES TO TO ONES MORAL AND SPIRITUAL GUIDANCE RESULTING IN A SIGNIFICANI
CONTRIBUTION TO ONES BEHAVIOR AND CHARACTER. THIS IS BARRING ANY PHYSICAL
OR CHEMICAL INFLUENCES OR ABERRATIONS. THIS IS TO SAY ONES SPIRITUAL
HEALLTH HAS ENORMOUS EFFECT ON THEIR MENTAL/EMOTIONAL HEALTH. A DR NICHOLS
REFUSES TO ADDRESS THE SUBJECT OF SCIENTOLOGY LIKE IT IS SACRED, FEARED,
POSSIBLY CONTAGIOUS ENTITY. IN THE MADISONVILLE COURT SHE STATED UNDER
OATH THAT EXPERT TESTIMONY WAS NEEDED RE: SCIENTOLOGY. IT WAS BROUGHT IN
IN ENORMOUS QUANTITIES. PSYCHOLOGISTS, PSYCHIATRISTS, CLERGY, CULT EXPERTS,
AND FORMER SCIENTOLOGISTS. ALL ADVOCATING ITS HARM TO CHILDREN AND
ADULTS TOO. AS A MATTER OF FACT NEITHER PARTY COULD PRESENT ANY TESTIMONY
THAT SCIENTOLOGY AND ITS POLICIES WERE BENEFICIAL TO THE CHILDREN. THIS
DR NICHOLS WAS INVITED BACK INTO PADGETT V PADGETT BY LAURA (not by me)
TO TRY TO GAIN SUPPORT FOR FURTHER DISCONNECTION OF THE "SP" FATHER AND
TO SUPPRESS AND CONTROL THEIR THOUGHTS. LAURA AND I BOTH AGREE OUR KIDS
ARE HAVING EMOTIONAL DIFFICULTIES WITH THE DIVORCE, CUSTODY, AND CONTINUAL
VISITATION PROBLEMS. BUT AGAIN OUR SOLUTIONS, BELIEFS OF WHAT THE SOURCE
AND CAUSES ARE, AND APPROACH ARE MUCH MUCH APART AND OPPOSED. I WANT TO
BE OPEN HONEST- AND.COMMUNICATIVE.....GET OUT!!! LAURA WANTS EVERY-
THING AND EVERBODY SUPPRESSED, HUSHED, AND CONTROLLED. SO THE QUESTION IS
YOU THINK IT IS ODD THAT THIS DR NICHOLS AGAIN AVOIDS SCIENTOLOGY (a
psychology based cult with santanic origins that has no religious or
higher being value except a science fiction writer) AND GOES ON TO
ASSERT THE CHILDRENS FATHER HAS BEHAVIOR AND CHARACTER PROBLEMS FOR HIS
ENORMOUS CONCERN IN THIS MATTER. SHE EVEN GOES ON TO RECOMMEND FURTHER
DISCONNECTION AND SUPERVISED (suppressed) CONTACT OF ME AND MY CHILDREN.
WHO ARE ALL CHRISTIANS. IS THIS ODD: JIM YOU HAVE ACTUALLY ADDRESSED THIS
FOR ME SO THIS IS MORE FOR TOM.
IN THE FINAL RULING FROM THE COURT, (now being appealled in Frankfort)
JUDGE BOTELER RECOMMENDED THAT THE CHILDRENS MATERNAL GRANDFATHER BE IN
CHARGE OF THEIR RELIGIOUS INSTRUCTION. NOW I CAN UNDERSTAND WHY IT WOULD
NOT RECOMMEND THEIR MOTHER BEING A SCIENTOLOGIST BUT THE QUESTION IS:
*DO YOU THINK IT IS ODD HE DID NOT RECOMMEND ME THE CHRISTIAN FATHER OF
CHRISTIAN CHILDREN.
*DO YOU THINK IT IS ODD. THAT HE DID NOT RECOMMEND THE PATERNAL GRANDMOTHER
WHO IS A CHRISTIAN WOMAN. THE DIFFERENCE BEING MY MOTHER DOS NOT KNOW
THE JUDGE. LAURAS FATHER DOES. I CAN UNDERSTAND THE JUDGE NOT RECOM-
MENDING THE CHILDRENS MATERNAL GRANDMOTHER AS SHE IS ON RECORD MORE THAN
ONCE THAT "THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH SCIENTOLOGY."
LAST SUMMER JULIE, BEAU, AND I WENT THROUGH SOME FACT FINDING EXCERCIZES TO
SEEK SOLUTIONS AND ANSWERS FROM ALL DIRECTIONS.AS TO WHY THINGS ARE S0
DIFFICULT BETWEEN THEIR MOM AND DAD.....PULLING OUT ALL THE STOPS AND NO .
HOLDS BARRED. AS I WAS TAUGHT AS A CHILD IN A CHRISTIAN AND EDUCATED
UPBRINGING TO ASK QUESTIONS IF YOU WANT THE ANSWERS. IF AN ANSWER DOES NOT
SOUND CORRECT SEEK 2nd AND 3rd OPINIONS FOR THE REAL TRUTH. HOWEVER TO BE
WARY OF THOSE WHO PROFESS TO BE INFORMED BUT CANNOT PROVIDE ANSWERS, OR ARE
SECRETIVE ABOUT THEM, OR CAN NOT ADMIT WHEN THEY ARE WRONG. ADDITIONALLY
THAT SILENCE HAS MUCH MEANING. I OWE THIS CRITICAL AND ANALYTICAL THINKING
MORE TO MY DAD AS A CHEMICAL ENGINEER THOUGH MY MOTHER IS A VERY HONEST AND
LOVING WOMAN. I WANT MY CHILDREN TO THINK, BELIEVE, AND TRUST THAT THESE
PRINCIPLES WORK THE BEST IN LIFE. WE POSED QUESTIONS TO THE JUDGE, THIS
DR NICHOLS, TO THEIR GRANDFATHER, TO A FLA. EXEXUTIVE OF THE SCIENTOLOGY
ORGANIZATION, AND TO YOU JIM. SEE THE ATTACHED LETTERS OF INQUIRY.
QUESTIONS FOR BOTH OF YOU TOM AND JIM.
*DO YOU THINK IT IS ODD THAT THE ONLY PERSON TO RESPOND WAS YOU JIM.
SUMMARIZED TO LAURA WHAT I THOUGH ANY POSSIBLE "WEDGES" WERE BETWEEN US
AND OUR CHILDREN. SEE THE ATTACHED 11/17/95 LETTER. SO THE QUESTION HERE
-5-
..........................
DO EITHER OF YOU THINK I AM OFF TARGET?
LASTLY, IN OCTOBER OF 1994, LAURA WROTE ME TO OUTLINE TO ME WHAT
SHE THOUGHT WAS GOOD POLICY AND GUIDELINES FOR OUR CHILDREN. MOST
OF ITS CONTENTS IN MY THINKING WAS ILLOGICAL OR SIMPLY STATING THAT SHE
WAS IN "CONTROL" OF THE CHILDREN EVEN WHEN THEY WERE WITH ME. ONE POINT
MADE TO ME (actually a rule) WAS THAT HER PRIOR APPROVAL WOULD BE RE-
QUIRED FOR THE CHILDREN TO RECIEVE ANY COUNSELING FROM A PSYCHOLOGIST,
PSYCHIATRIST, SOCIAL WORKER, OR MINISTER. SHE PROBABLY THOUGHT THIS WAS
BEST SINCE I HAD REQUESTED REPEATEDLY THAT THE CHILDREN STAY AWAY FROM
SCIENTOLOGY. THE PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHOLOGY PART DID NOT SURPRIZE ME SINCE
THEY ARE IN OPPOSITION AND COMPETITION WITH SCIENTOLOGY. THE SOCIAL WORKER
I AM NOT SURE WHY THAT. I RESPONDED TO HER THAT WHILE THE CHILDREN WERE
WITH ME I WAS RESPONSIBLE NOT ONLY THEIR PHYSICAL WELL BEING (MEDICAL) BUT
FOR THEIR MENTAL, EMOTIONAL, AND SPIRITUAL HEALTH TOO. SO.......
* DO YOU THINK I T IS.-ODD LAURA WOULD BE CONCERNED ABOUT THEM
MEETING WITH A MINISTER OF THEIR OWN FAITH WITHOUT HER APPROVAL.
IN ALL THESE QUESTIONS PLEASE SUBSTITUTE THE WORD "ODD" WITH SUSPICIOUS
OR VERY QUESTIONABLE. I HAVE ASKED FOR YOUR HELP IN THESE ISSUES AND
UNDERSTANDINGS AS THEY HAVE REACHED DRAMATICALLY HARSH AND HARMFULL
PROPORTIONS TO A POINT OF MAJOR DESTRUCTION AND DISHONESTY ON THE PART
OF PEOPLE WHO ALLEGE TO BE CARING, EDUCATATED, IMPARTIAL, RESPONSIBLE,
MORAL, DECENT, AND LAW ABIDING. MOST IF NOT ALL PEOPLE SEE THIS AS A
CONSPIRACY AGAINST ME AND MY CHILDREN .... THAT IS OUTSIDE OF HOPKINS COUNTY
KY. MOST IF NOT ALL CAN NOT IMAGINE A JUDGE ALLOWING SO MUCH LEGAL,
FINANCIAL, EMOTIONAL, PROFESSIONAL, AND PARENTAL DAMAGE TO ACCRUE AND ESCU-
LATE SOLEY FOR THE 1st AMMENDMENT PROTECTION OF ONE PERSON -- MY CHILDRENS
MOTHER AND HER FREEDOM TO PRACTICE HER SCIENTOLOGY UPON HER CHILDREN AND
THEIR FATHER THE DECLARED "SP" AND "PTS" ENEMY TO BE DESTROYED AND DIS-
CONNECTED. THIS IS A HUGE SECRET COVER-UP GAME OF PRETEND. I AM SURE
I WILL NO LONGER BE FINANCIALLY, MORALY, ETHICALLY, OR SPIRITUALLY ABLE
TO PERFORM TO THE COURT ORDERS ROLLING. OUT OF THIS COURT ROOM AS THOUGH-
L. RON HUBBARD HIMSELF WAS THE JUDGE. I FORESEE NO END TO BENCH-WARRANTS
FOR ARREST BECAUSE I DEMAND THE TRUTH, FAIRNES$,WISDOM, AND COURAGE FROM
A JURISDICTION THAT I AM AN ALIEN TOO. I SEE NO END TO WHAT LENGTHS THIS
COLLUSIVE EFFORT TO DOG THE CHRISTIAN FATHER, LYING TO MY CHILDREN, AND
CONDONE THE ACTIONS OF THE SCIENTOLOGIST MOTHER AND HER AGENTS. AS A
RESPONSIBLE AND COMMITTED FATHER AND BELIEVER IN GOD AND HIS SON JESUS
CHRIST -I -AM TRYING SO HARD NOT TO FEAR THIS EVIL AND HATRED.
AT THIS POINT, PASTOR TOM IF CHARLES BOTELER WON'T TALK TO YOU ON THIS MAT-
ER IF HE'S NOT A MEMBER OF YOUR CHURCH PERHAPS YOU COULD CHAT WITH HIS
MINISTER OF THE CHURCH HE BELONGS TO. I REALIZE THAT IS PRESUMPTUOUS.
THANKING YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR ANSWERS. I WANT AT SOME POINT IN TIME
TO BE ABLE TO SHARE THIS WHOLE TERRIBLE EXPIRIENCE WITH MANY AS IT
READS LIKE A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL OR AN EPISODE ON THE TWILIGHT ZONE.
AND TO BE ABLE TO COUNSEL OTHERS CAUGHT IN THE "SP" ZONE. IT DOES HELP TO
REMIND ONESSELF OF MR HUBBARD'S PRIMARY AND ORIGINAL AVOCATION -- A SCI FI
GENIUS WITH AN EXTRAORDINARY TALENT FOR CONJURING ILLUSIONARY CONCEPTS AND
STORIES INTO BELIEVABLE ENTERTAINMENT. THIS IS WHAT THIS JUDGE IS PRO-
TECTING FOR THE CHILDRENS SCIENTOLOGIST MOTHER AT THE EXPENSE OF THE
CHRISTIAN FATHER, DAUGHTER, AND SON!?!?!?! IT IS THE FIRM BELIEF OF A MULT-
ITITUDE OF FAMILY AND FRIENDS (not just me) OUT SIDE OF HOPKINS COUNTY AND
THE SCIENTOLOGY ORGANIZATION, THAT WHEN THE JUDGE WAS PRESENTED WITH ALL THE
FACTS, INFO, PRACTICES, POLICIES, CASE LAW, EXPERT TESTIMONY, AND PROVEN
-6-
HUMAN DESTRUCTION (psychological, emotional, spiritual, and financial)
CAUSED BY THIS GROUP TO THOUSANDS OF OTHER VICTIMS HE KNEW IT WAS BAD,NAST
UGLY, DIRTY, DANGEROUS, DESPICABLE AND CONTEMPTABLE NOT JUST FOR CHILDREN
BUT FOR ADULTS. A MAN WITH 4 YEARS OF COLLEGE AND 4 YEARS OF LAW SCHOOL
CAN NOT BE THAT OBTUSE THEREFORE HIS 1994 RULING ON THE INADMISSABILITY
OF SCIENTOLOGY WAS SOLEY BASED ON HIS COMMITMENT TO HIS VANNOY FAMILY
ACQUAINTENCES TO HELP HIDE A GRUESOME AND REPUGNANT REALITY. TO ALLOW
SCIENTOLOGY IN THIS CASE WOULD MEAN CERTAIN LOSS OF CUSTODY, MARITAL IN-
VESTMENTS, INCONVENIENCE, AND DAILY ACCESS TO JULIE AND BEAU PADGETT FOR
THE VANNOY FAMILY .... NOT JUST LAURA. PERHAPS EVEN VOTES OR POLITICAL
SUPPORT FOR THE JUDGE.AND ANY FUTURE ASPIRATIONS, ELECTIONS, OR APPOINTMENT.
IN THE COUNTY, STATE, OR FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM. HIS CONTINUED COMMITTME
TO SUPPORT SCIENTOLOGY HAS (or originally had) NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY DEEP
LOVE AND RESPECT OF THE CONSTITUTION AND IT'S 1st AND 14th AMENDMENTS. THIS
IS THE ASSESSMENT OF MANY MANY PEOPLE WHO HAVE HAD A WATCHFULL EYE ON THIS
CASE -- IT IS NOT JUST MINE.
* DO.YOU AGREE WITH THIS ASSESSMENT?-
* DO YOU AGREE WITH THIS IS "REPREHENSIBLE" OR ........
* DO YOU AGREE WITH THE JUDGE THAT I, THE CHRISTIAN FATHER, AM THE.
"REPREHENSIBLE ASS" FOR WANTING THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING
BUT THE TRUTH .... SO HELP ME GOD (not L.Ron Hubbard)
THIS DR NICHOLS HAS JUMPED ON THIS BANDWAGON TOO ALSO OUT OF LACK OF COURAGE
AND WISDOM FOR HER PERSONAL GAIN/S. I TALKED WITH HER ON THE PHONE LAST
OCTOBER AND SHE TOLD ME SHE HAD RESERVATIONS ABOUT REMAINING IN THIS CASE
AND NEEDED TO GET CLARIFICATION FROM THE JUDGE ON HOW TO PROCEED. A MONTH
LATER OUT OF THE WILD BLUE WE GET A LETER FROM HER TO THE JUDGE STATING
THAT I AM HARASSING AND ABUSING HER AND HAVE BEHAVIOR AND CHARACTER PROBLEM;
FOR AGAIN REQUESTING HER TO BE FORTHRIGHT AND TO CONSULT THE MULTITUDE
OF EXPERTS PROVIDED TO HER THAT SHE SAID UNDER OATH WAS NEEDED RE: SCIENTO-
LOGY. THE FIRST WE (my attorneys and I) KNEW OF THIS LETTER, WAS ATTACHED
TO A MOTION FROM LAURAS ATTORNEY TO MAKE COURT EXHIBIT AND RECOMMENDED LAW.
AGAIN THE SAME ATTORNEY MYSTERIOUSLY CONNECTED TO THE FLAG LAND BASE HEAD-
QUARTERS OF-SCIENTOLOGY IN CLEARWATER, FL,
* DO EITHER OF YOU THINK IT IS BAD BEHAVIOR OR BAD CHARACTER TO
QUESTION SCIENTOLOGY FOR ME AND MY CHILDREN?
* DO EITHER OF YOU THINK IT IS HARASSING ORABUSIVE TO HAVE DIALOGUE
WITH A PSYCHOLOGIST WHO IS COURT APPOINTED TO PERFORM A COMPLETE
EVALUATION (not rigged, biassed, incomplete, or bought off) TO DE-
TERMIND THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE PADGETT'S CHRISTIAN CHILDREN?
* DO OU THINK IT IS APPROPRIATE TO HAVE ONLY CONTACT WITH THE SCIENTO-
LOGIST MOTHER AND HER LEGAL COUNSEL AND NOT THE CHRISTIAN FATHER AND
HIS LEGAL COUNSEL RELATIVE TO THE COURT APPOINTED PSYCHOLOGIST.
* DO YOU THINK THIS REINVOLVEMENT OF THIS PSYCHOLOGIST SHOULD HAVE BEEN
WRITTEN, ENGINEERED, NARROWED, WITH A PREDETERMINDED OUT COME OF "RE-
STRICTED VISITATION" WITH THE CHRISTIAN FATHER AS A REQUESTED WISH OF
THE SCIENTOLOGIST MOTHER BY HER COUNSEL (not the judge) WITHOUT ANY
INPUT BY THE CHRISTIAN FATHER OR HIS COUNSEL RELATIVE TO METHODOLOGY?
COMBINE ALL OF THE JUDGES, THE PSYCHOLOGISTS, THE SCIENTOLOGIST AND COUNSEL
ACTIONS, WORDS, AND INVOLVEMENT AND .....
* DOES THIS HAVE AN ODOR (significant or slight) OF COLLUSION?
* " " " " " " " " " CONSPIRACY?
* " " " " " " " " " RAILROADING?
* " " " " " " " " " PERSECUTION?
OF THE CHRISTIAN OR
THE OUTSIDER OR "SP"?
* " " " " " " " " " MONEY AND/OR GREED
-7-
THE "KICKER" IRONY IN THIS MATTER IS: THE COURT ORDERED ME TO PAY FOR
THE FOLLOWING:
1. THIS DR NICHOL'S FEES? AND HER TESTIMONY TIME WHICH MOST OF
WAS WAITING IN THE LAW OFFICES OF THE SCIENTOLOGIST'S ATTORNEY
WITH THE MATERNAL GRANDMOTHER WHO STATES" "HERE IS NOTHING WRONG
WITH SCIENTOLOGY THE JUDGE SAID SO, AND THAT I AM INSANE, A MONSTER
A PSYCHOPATH, SOCIOPATH, THE CAUSE OF HER AND MANY OTHERS HEALTH
AND EMOTIONAL PROBLEMS, AND WE'LL GO TO THE JUDGE AND HE WON'T BE
ABLE TO SEE THESE KIDS AGAIN."
2. THE FEE'S OF EXPERT TESTIMONY THAT STATE DR NICHOLS OMISSION OF
SCIENTOLOGY IN THE CUSTODIAL EVALUATION WAS THE SIZE OF AN
ELEPHANT WALKING AROUND IN THIS COURT AND NO ONE NOTICING IT. THIS
WAS A DR DAVIS IN LEXINGTON. A CHRISTIAN PSYCHOLOGIST.
3. ONE HALF OF LAURA'S ATTORNEY'S FEES IN KY. IN ADDITION TO ALL OF
MINE
4. ALL THE COURT FEE'S IN MADISONVILLE.
5. ALL THE TAX BURDENS OF THE MARITAL INVESTMENTS.
6. ALL LAURA'S ATTORNEYS FEE'S, THE COURT COSTS, ETC. OF HER LITIGATION
WITH MY MOTHER IN PALM BEACH, FL THAT I AM NOT NAMED IN NOR CAUSED
KEEPING IN MIND MY MOTHER WAS ALSO INDENTIFIED AS AN "SP" THEREFOR
OK TO LIE TO.......ACTUALLY IN THIS CASE PERJURY UNDER OATH.
7. ALL THE AIRLINE TRANSPORTATION FEES FOR VISITATION OF THE CHILDREN
THUS BEING A POTENTIAL FOR "ECONOMIC" DISCONNECTION. UNDER THE
CURRENT FINANCIAL REALITIES OF THE CHRTSTIAN FATHER.
8. MORE MISC.
ALL THIS WAS DONE WITH FULL KNOWLEDGE THAT I WAS UNEMPLOYED FROM CULT
ATTACKS LINKED DIRECTLY TO SCIENTOLOGY/LAURA/AND HER HALLYBURTON ATTORNEY.
ALSO KNOWING THAT LAURA WAS FULLY EMPLOYED AND NOT UNDER PROFESSIONAL
ATTACKS FROM MY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH.(not their policy nor would conceive of)
* DO YOU THINK THIS IS FAIR OR EQUITABLE?
* DOES THIS HAVE ANY ODER OF BIAS OR THE PREVIOUSLY NOTED CONCERNS OF
COLLUSION, CONSPIRACY, RAILROADING, PERSECUTION, GREED, OR SOMEKIND
OF FINANCIAL PUNISHMENT OR TACTIC TO CRUSH THE CHRISTIAN/SP/OUTSIDER
DISSIDENT TO THE POINT OF BANKRUPTCY. TO SHUT UP AND GO AWAY.
NOTE THE ATTACHED SCIENTOLOGY INVESTMENT OF $8400 MADE BY LAURA IN A JOINT
ACCOUNT (marital by state laws) AND ITS SUBSEQUENT RETURN/REFUND TO HER NOT
US. (notEthis is just the tip of the iceberg dollarwise) I ASK YOU
AS THEOLOGIANS: (not a legal or I.R.S. questions)
* IS THIS THE KIND OF "DONATION" WOULD LIKE TO SEE IN YOUR WEEKLY
OFFERINGS IN THE BASKET BY ONE INDIVIDUAL AT YOUR CHURCHES.
* HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF A "DONATION" BEING REFUNDED?
* DO YOU CONSIDER THIS A "DONATION" (not an I.R.S. CONTEMPLATION)
* DO YOU THINK LAURA SHOULD BE CONSTANTLY FILING CONTEMPT OF COURT
CHARGES AND REQUESTING BENCH WARRANT ARRESTS FOR MY FAILURE TO PAY
CHILD SUPPORT DURING MY TIME OF UNEMPLOYMENT (from scientology attacks)
WHILE SHE HAS THIS KIND OF MONEY TO TOSS ABOUT...."INVEST" IN RON HUB-
BARDS MONEY MACHINE.
* KNOWING THIS KIND OF SPENDING BEHAVIOR, DO YOU THINK I SHOULD HAVE SAY
WHAT CHILD SUPPORT IS USED FOR AND SOME MAJOR DECISION?
* DO YOU THINK IT IS ODD THAT THIS SAME "FLAG SERVICE ORGANIZATION"
IS RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO THE A "BOGUS" ADDRESS (not legitimate) OF A
GROUP OF PEOPLE WERE SPYING ON ME IN ORLANDO REPORTING MISSLEADING INFO.
DIRECTLY TO LAURA'S MADISONVILLE ATTORNEY AND HIM TURNING AROUND AND
GIVING IT TO JUDGE BOTELER AS THOUGH IT WAS REAL AND ACCURATE PRIVATE
INVESTIGATION? ALL TO GAIN A WARRANT FOR MY INCARCERATION.
* DO YOU THINK IT IS WRONG FOR ME TO OBJECT TO THE POSSIBLE AND PROBABLE
"SELF-FUNDING" OF MY OWN DESTRUCTION AND DISCONNECTION WITH MY KIDS.
-8-
* IN THEORY, IF IT IS POLICY OF A CHURCH TO REPAY/REFUND/RETURN TO ITS
MEMBERS IN THIS CASE, COULD THEY REFUND EVEN MORE TO US JOINTLY,
SINCE "I WAS UNABLE TO RECEIVE SERVICES"? THE DISCOVERED MARITAL
INVESTMENTS IN' SCIENTOLOGY WERE IN EXCESS OF $50,000. IF I WAS TO
PROMISE TO GIVE THIS RECOVERED AMOUNT TO YOUR CHURCHS (split) WOULD
YOU HELP JULIE, BEAU, AND I IN THIS MONEY MATTER? I THINK WE WOULD
RATHER BE IN OUR OWN CHURCHES AND NOT IN THE ORGANIZATION (alleged
to be a church) ... THE MONEY THAT IS. ESPECIALLY SINCE THIS IS THE
GROUP WHO'S POLICY IT IS TO DISCONNECT US, DESTROY US, AND SUPPRESS
US.
IN OCTOBER OF 1992, I MADE AN OFFER TO JULIE AND BEAUS MOM (in writing)
IF DIVORCE AND CUSTODY IS WHAT SHE WANTS TO SOLVE OUR SCIENTOLOGICAL
DIFFERENCES THAT WERE IRRECONCILABLE (they weren't considered religious
at that time only untill Laura discovered she could seek a 1st amendment
bidding place for a host of deeds and money did it become religious)
TO TAKE ANY ESTIMATED ATTORNEYS FEES AND COURT COSTS AND INVEST IN SAVINGS
ACCOUNTS FOR THE KIDS FUTURE -- COLLEGE, CARS, TRIPS, ETC. THIS IS NOW
IN EXCESS OF $90,000 AND CLIMBING. I SUGGESTED WE MEDIATE INSTEAD. I
MADE THIS OFFER AS A MORE PRUDENT ALTERNATIVE SO AT LEAST THE KIDS COULD
BENEFIT. THIS WAS ALSO MOTIVATED AFTER DIGGING INTO SCIENTOLOGIES
"HIDDEN BENEATH THE SURFACE POLICIES" ONE OF WHICH WAS TO USE THE LAW AND
COURTS TO HARASS, RUIN, AND DESTROY ITS CRITICS (me) AS WELL AS FINDING
OUT LAURA HIRED A KNOWN RUTHLESS AND UNCOOPERATIVE "OVERLITIGATOR" WHOSE
LEGAL PEERS REPORT BEING UNETHICAL IN HIS DEALINGS AND AN "ASS" IRONICALLY
THE SAME WORD SCIENTOLOGY AND THE JUDGE USE TO CALL ME. LAURA TURNED THIS
OFFER DOWN AND HAS DONE REPEATEDLY SINCE BUT CLAIMS SHE HAS THE BEST IN-
TEREST OF THE CHILDREN IN MIND AT ALL TIMES.
• DO YOU THINK THIS WAS A WISE, RATIONAL, SANE, AND CHRISTIAN GESTURE?
* DO YOU THINK JULIE AND BEAU WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER OFF WITH THIS
STRATEGY?
* LESS COMBATIVE? ....SINCE AS OF 12/18/95 THE HON. JUDGE BOTELER
NOTED IN COURT THAT THE PADGETT V PADGETT FILE IS. THE THICKEST
DIVORCE FILE HE HAS SEEN AS JUDGE IN THIS COURT.
AGAIN ON 12/18/95, JUDGE BOTELER QUIPED THAT THE PADGETT V PADGETT CASE
WAS LIKE THE "BOSNIAN CONFLICT" YET INSINUATING IT WAS THE CHRISTIAN
FATHERS FAULT OR CAUSE.
* IF A MAN OF HIS EDUCATION, AND POSITION OF POWER AND WISDOM SHOULD
MAKE SUCH AN ANALOGY, DO YOU THINK HE SHOULD BE COMPLETELY FAMILIAR
AND WELL READ ON THE DISPUTE BETWEEN THE SERBS AND CROATIONS?
* LIKEWISE BETWEEN THE SCIENTOLOGIST MOTHER (petitioner) AND THE
CHRISTIAN FATHER (respondent) CONFLICT OF/BY JULIE AND BEAUS PARENTS.
SHOULD HE BE WELL READ AND FAMILIAR?
* IN THIS ROLE ROLE AS A PUBLIC SERVANT (not a servant to the Vannoy
family) SHOULD HE BE TAKING THE POSITION OF A U.N. PEACEKEEPING
FORCE IN THIS ANALOGY OR SHOULD HE BE CONDONING AND PARICIPATING IN
REPEATED BOMBINGS AND ARTILLERY RAIDS BY THE SERBIANS OR CROATIONS
Nhoever he sees as the Vannoys or scientologists factions) FOR
ECONOMIC/EMOTIONAL PLEASURE FOR ONE SIDE AND PAIN FOR THE OTHER
DISREGARDING THE DAMAGE TO THE CHILDREN WHO ARE PADGETTS AND
CHRISTIANS.....NOT VANNOYS OR SCIENTOLOGISTS?
* DO YOU THINK IT IS IRONIC THAT ALSO IN THIS ANALOGY FROM THE JUDGE
THAT IN 1989 THE U.N. ADOPTED THE OFFICIAL RECOGNITION OF CHILDRENS
RIGHTS OF FREEDOM OF RELIGION, THOUGHT, CONSCIENCE, AND TO EXPRESS
SUCH FREELY AND TO HAVE THAT INTO ACCOUNT IN ANY MATTER AFFECTING
THE CHILD" BUT THE VANNOY, SCIENTOLOGY, MADISONVILLE LEGAL ARENA,
-9-
PROFOUND DR NICHOLS WANT THE CHILDREN "HUSHED" "SUPERVISED WITH THE
CHRISTIAN FATHER" AND HAVE THEIR WORDS "SIGNED DOCUMENTS DISREGAREDED"
SO THAT THE TRUE NATURE OF THE CONFLICT IS "SUPPRESSED" AS IT ENTERS THE
APPEALS COURT.
LAST CHRISTMAS EVE, MY SON APPROACHED ME SAYING "DADDY I STILL WANT TO
LIVE WITH YOU AND THIS SCIENTOLOGY STUFF CONFUSES AND BOTHERS ME." I
REPLIED (with enormous strength and restraint) "HONEY I KNOW AND AGREE
BUT WE ARE NOT GOING TO TALK ABOUT IT THIS TRIP, WE WILL ANOTHER TIME
SOON." I REALIZE THIS WAS THE CORRECT LEGAL RESPONSE (HOPKINS COUNTY
PROSCIENTOLOGY LAW THAT IS) BUT::::::
* WAS THIS THE CORRECT CHRISTIAN RESPONSE?
* SHOULD I HAVE ADDRESSED. IT WITH BEAU THEN AND DISREGARDED THE COURT
ORDER AS A VIOLATION IN BOTH OF OUR RIGHTS OF FREE SPEECH AND RELIGION:
ON CHRISTMAS DAY NIGHT, BEAU WANTED TO TALK SOME MORE TELLING ME HE WISHES
ALL THIS STUFF PROBLEM BETWEEN HIS MOM AND I WOULD STOP. I SAID I AGREED
AND TOLD HIM I WAS TRYING VERY HARD TO STOP IT. HE WENT ON TO TELL ME
HIS MOTHER SAID WE ARE NOT A :AMILY UNIT ANY MORE BECAUSE OF WOMAN IN
MICHIGAN. I IMMEDIATELY TOLD MY LOVING AND TRUSTING SON "NO THAT IS NOT
TRUE.....IT IS SCIENTOLOGY, BUT WE ARE GOING TO HOLD OFF ON TALKING
ABOUT THIS FOR THIS VISIT." IN JUDGE BOTELERS ANALOGY THIS WOULD BE LIKE
SAYING THE PROBLEM WITH THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA THE SERBS CLOSED THE YUGO
PLANT AND THE CROATIAN WANTS THAT TO BE THE PROBLEM SO THAT REAL POLITICAL,
RELIGIOUS, ETHNIC CAUSES OF UNECESSARY HATRED CAN BE ALLOWED TO PERSIST.
* DO EITHER OF YOU FEEL ONE PARENT SHOULD BE IN TOTAL CONTROL AS TO
RELATE THEIR CHILDREN THE CAUSES OF PROBLEMS OF VISITATION, CUSTODY,
RELIGION, FINANCES, PARENTAL BEHAVIOR, PARENTAL COMMUNICATION,
COSTLY LEGAL PROTRACTION, AND WHO IS HARASSING WHO?
ONE OF THE SUGGESTIONS I MADE TO LAURA ON SEVERAL OCCASSIONS WAS FOR
BOTH OF US TO MEET TOGETHER WITH A RESPONSIBLE NEUTRAL THIRD PARTY SUCH.
AS A CLERGY (such as yourselves) A PSYCHOLOGIST, A PSYCHIATRIST, ETC.
FOR EVALUATIVE AND COUNSELING SESSIONS ON HOW TO COMMUNICATE AND COOPERATE
BETTER BTWEEN US FOR THE BEST INTEREST OF OUR KIDS PRESENT AND FUTURE
WELL-BEING. SHE HAS DECLINED REGULARLY. I REQUESTED THIS DR NICHOLS
TO DO THIS WHEN SHE GOT REINVOLVED AGAIN. SHE DECLINED TOO.
* DO YOU THINK THIS IS A GOOD IDEA? -
* DO YOU AGREE THIS KIND OF EVALUATION IS NEEDED MORE THAN EVALUATION
OF THE KIDS AT THIS TIME?
* WOULD EITHER- OF- YOU VOLUNTEER TQ DO THIS?. ,
* DO YOU THINK THIS WOULD BE MORE PRODUCTIVE THAN LAWYERS AND COURTS?
PASTOR TOM, WOULD YOU VOLUNTEER TO BE AN AGREED UPON OR COURT APPOINTED
PARENT COMMUNICATOR IF LAURA AGREES TO THIS TO AVOID LITIGATORY INSANITY
FOR US AND OUR CHILDREN. THEY NEED LOTS OF LOVE AND COOPERATION AND NOT
SUPRESSION AND ANIMOSITY. I THINK THIS CAN BECOME A REALITY IN THE PRESENCE
OF THE TRUTH THAT ONLY GOD'S INFINITE WISDOM AND LOVE COULD REMEDY. I
BELEIVE SCIENTOLOGY IS LIKE A DEADLY CANCER AND IF ALLOWED TO PERSIST IT
WILL CRIPPLE, MAIM, DISFIGURE, AND CAUSE EMOTIONAL, SPIRITUAL, FINANCIAL.
AND PHYSICAL DAMAGE IF NOT DEATH. THE CURE IS JUST IN THE OTHER ROOM AND
READILY AVAILABLE FOR SWIFT RECOVERY. JUDGE BOTELER AND HIS COURT KEEPS
THE DOOR LOCKED AND THE PROVEN ELIXIR HIDDEN. I AM CLUELESS WHY?
SINCERELY THANKFULL,
[SIGNATURE]
TOM PADGETT, JULIE AND BEAUS LOVING AND COMMITTED
FATHER